Summary

Top 10 papers analyzed

1. Identify the section of the text that contains numbers such as measurements, test results, medication doses, dates, ages, etc. These sections typically contain tables, lists or sentences with numbers and units of measurement. 2. Detect numbers in the identified sections. This can be done using regular expressions to find digits and decimal points. For example, [0-9]+ can be used to find integers and [0-9]+\.[0-9]+ can be used to find decimal numbers. 3. Identify the units associated with the numbers. The units can typically be found in the text immediately before or after the number. Extract the units along with the numbers. 4. Standardize the units to a consistent format. For example, mg, MG and mgs can be standardized to mg. mL and cc can be standardized to mL. 5. Identify any qualifiers or modifiers associated with the numbers such as greater than (>), less than (<), approximately (~), etc. and extract them along with the numbers. 6. Identify the data type for the extracted numbers and units such as weight, height, blood pressure, hematocrit, date, etc. This can be done using the context around the numbers as well as the units. 7. Store the extracted numbers, units and data types for further analysis and processing. 8. Handle exceptions and special cases. For example, numbers spelled out in words need to be converted to digits. Ranges indicated using hyphens or the word 'to' need to be extracted as two separate numbers. 9. Evaluate the accuracy of the extraction using a manually annotated gold standard test set. Precision, recall and F1-score can be calculated to determine accuracy. 10. Improve the extraction based on errors identified in the evaluation. Additional rules and patterns can be added to increase accuracy. The process needs to be tailored for the particular medical domain and record system. But these general principles can help get started with extracting quantitative information from clinical text. Let me know if you have any other questions!

RA treatments were described in 1,789 journal entries; 15 drugs were identified with a high algorithm accuracy (0.97).

Published By:

T. Maarseveen - undefined

2019

Cited By:

0

NLP parser extracted mental health criteria; precisoin was high but recall low. A case study of 4480 electronic health records over 10 years showed changes in social criteria.

Published By:

Gondy Leroy - Journal of Medical Internet Research

2018

Cited By:

24

We explored using text to identify mental disorders from unstructured text in domestic violence (DV) police reports. From a training set of 200 DV records, we designed a technique to detect disorders for people and victims. .

Published By:

George Karystianis - Journal of Medical Internet Research

2018

Cited By:

24

The v3NLP Framework evolved to scale natural language processing tools and customize techniques for tasks like document classification. Beyond scalability, v3NLP Framework projects were tested and benchmarked.

Published By:

G. Divita - eGEMs

2016

Cited By:

15

Six articles explore automating knowledge extraction from health data;goals are accurate classification and patient characterization from unorganized records and quantitative data.

Published By:

D. Giuse - undefined

1999

Cited By:

0

Dysthyroidism found in 90 patients and associated with better survival.A data analytics solution validated data from patient records showing dysthyroidism linked to improved overall survival.

Published By:

M. Beaufils - Journal of Clinical Oncology

2022

Cited By:

0

Statinezetimibe combo achievedLDL targets better: Twotrials found in highrisk adults. No evidenceshows combining a statin with another agent improves outcomes more than statin mono.

Published By:

Mukul Sharma - Annals of Internal Medicine

2009

Cited By:

80

Medical records are increasingly used in research but face challenges. Computerization and standardization can improve records and benefit psychiatry.

Published By:

A. Heath - Psychological Medicine

1982

Cited By:

0

FITs are screening tests used to detect colorectal cancer, studies show pooled sensitivity 79% & specificity 94%.

Published By:

Jeffrey-K Lee - Annals of Internal Medicine

2014

Cited By:

558

The research examined technologies for preventing and detecting falls in hospital patients. Most studies focused on multicomponent approaches or fall detection devices; fewer assessed risk factors or environmental changes.

Published By:

Kay Cooper - JBI Evidence Synthesis

2021

Cited By:

6